伍迪艾伦 伍迪·艾伦 伍迪·艾伦真的有恋童癖吗？_伍迪·艾伦

网友magasa对[伍迪·艾伦]伍迪·艾伦真的有恋童癖吗？给出的答复：
关于最近爆出来的这件新闻，其实除了玩具火车这个新的细节外，并没有任何新鲜的材料。我建议在八卦之前，先花一点基本的史料爬梳工夫，搞清楚最基本的事实。

可先看看网友翻译的这篇文章：《控诉伍迪艾伦：别这么快下结论》
http://i.mtime.com/5446820/blog/7743244/

围绕伍迪·艾伦的性丑闻，主要是两件事。

一是他和宋宜的婚姻。

二是他涉嫌猥亵养女迪伦·法罗。

这两件事有一定关联，但仍然是两件不同的事，有必要分别对待。

关于第一件，估计很多人最近终于知道了，宋宜并非伍迪·艾伦的养女，而是他当时女友米亚·法罗和前夫普列文的养女。伍迪·艾伦和宋宜的恋爱，是两个成年人之间的自愿行为（宋宜当年二十岁左右），而且他们在谈恋爱之前彼此不熟。尽管我也觉得一个男人和女友的养女谈恋爱是有点奇怪，但也仅仅是奇怪而已，这种行为谈不上触犯法律，似乎也不算十恶不赦、罪该万死吧。

关于第二件更棘手一点，最近成为了全世界媒体热议的焦点，但其实只是二十年前的冷饭重炒。如果说上一件丑闻事实非常清楚，剩下的只是各人根据各自的道德观作出判断，那么第二件在事实层面上仍存在争议，在事实尚不清楚的情况下，我认为妄下结论和评判是不妥的。

也许这件事情的真相将永远扑朔迷离，但仍有一些基本的情况和双方的说法有必要让更多人知道。二十年前美国媒体对这个案件的报道铺天盖地，我检索了《纽约时报》在那段时期关于此案的所有报道，按照时间顺序列出链接和摘要。即使你真的那么急着作出判断，也希望是在了解这些基本事实和双方说法之后。

每篇报道的时间就在链接上显示，所以不另指出了。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1992/08/14/nyregion/woody-allen-files-child-custody-lawsuit.html

伍迪·艾伦向法院提出诉讼，与米亚·法罗争夺三名子女的抚养权，这三名子女是养子摩西、养女迪伦，和亲生儿子罗南。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1992/08/19/nyregion/striking-back-woody-allen-denies-child-sex-abuse-allegation.html

伍迪·艾伦罕见地举行记者招待会，还击了米亚·法罗对他的攻击。他否认了对他猥亵养女迪伦的指控。他说，这都是米亚·法罗想剥夺他的抚养权的伎俩。他还说米亚·法罗希望他支付700万美元，这样就不把猥亵案捅出去，但他拒绝了这一勒索。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1992/08/23/nyregion/woody-allen-tells-his-side-to-a-magazine.html

伍迪·艾伦接受《时代周刊》采访，他说，他对和米亚·法罗的养女宋宜陷入情网这件事没有任何道德上的不安；以及重申他没有猥亵养女迪伦·法罗。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1992/08/26/nyregion/allen-and-farrow-meet-with-judge-in-chambers.html

伍迪·艾伦和米亚·法罗在法官主持下见面。

http://www.aIhUaU.commagazine/archive/1992/11/farrow199211

《名利场》发表站在米亚·法罗角度的长篇文章《米亚的故事》。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1992/11/23/nyregion/woody-allen-talks-about-custody-fight.html

伍迪·艾伦接受CBS电视采访，说米亚·法罗多次威胁他，除了人身威胁之外，她还说：「你夺走了我的女儿（指她和前夫的养女宋宜），我也要夺走你的女儿（指要剥夺艾伦对两人共同的养女迪伦·法罗的监护权）。」

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/01/09/nyregion/both-sides-in-allen-suit-scolded-for-courting-press.html

法官批评艾伦和法罗双方的律师把案件审理情况泄露给媒体，这和他们号称保护孩子不受伤害的承诺表里不一。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/03/19/nyregion/woody-allen-says-report-clears-him.html

耶鲁纽黑文医院的专家组经过七个月的调查，得出结论，伍迪·艾伦并未猥亵养女迪伦·法罗。迪伦的录像指控可能是出于幻想或者其他人的操纵。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/03/20/nyregion/woody-allen-tells-of-affair-as-custody-battle-begins.html

监护权官司开庭，伍迪·艾伦和米亚·法罗第一次碰面。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/03/23/nyregion/nude-photographs-are-focus-of-woody-allen-s-testimony.html

宋宜的裸照成为法庭上的焦点。伍迪·艾伦坚持认为这是两个成年人之间的自愿行为。拍裸照是宋宜的主意，但他建议了那些姿势。他认为那些照片是erotic，但并非pornographic。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/03/24/nyregion/a-son-s-anguished-letter-rivets-woody-allen-hearing.html

法庭上宣读了艾伦和法罗的另一名养子摩西的信。摩西在信中痛斥艾伦，说从此不再把他视为父亲。值得一提的是，案件结束后，摩西渐渐疏远了养母米亚·法罗，并在近年重新和伍迪·艾伦与宋宜建立了联系，还说小时候被母亲「洗脑」了。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/03/26/nyregion/farrow-testifies-that-daughter-accused-allen-of-molestation.html

米亚·法罗出庭作证，指控伍迪·艾伦猥亵了他们七岁的养女迪伦·法罗，她同时承认没能取得医学上的证据。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/03/30/nyregion/doctor-recounts-threats-by-farrow-against-allen.html

一位临床心理学家出庭作证，她说她警告过伍迪·艾伦，担心米亚·法罗会危害他的安全。这位心理学家还说，迪伦·法罗和伍迪·艾伦的关系的确有些「不当的亲密」，但她不认为那和性有关。她还说在三年前为迪伦做过一个测试，发现这个小女孩容易迷失于幻想。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/04/02/nyregion/psychologist-testifies-about-visitation-rights-for-allen.html

心理学家认为艾伦可以在无监控的条件下探视他和法罗的亲生儿子罗南，但心理学家不太确定艾伦是否可以探视迪伦·法罗。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/04/03/nyregion/allen-s-sister-says-farrow-sows-hatred-in-children.html

伍迪·艾伦的妹妹出庭作证，她说艾伦是个好父亲，为了陪伴孩子更改电影拍摄的日程，她认为米亚·法罗在子女中散播对艾伦的仇恨。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/04/07/nyregion/tale-of-the-tape-more-telephone-recordings-in-the-allen-farrow-fight.html

伍迪·艾伦的律师提交电话录音证据，录音中法罗家的老管家认为法罗不是一个好妈妈。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/04/10/nyregion/sitter-questions-allen-actions-with-daughter.html

一个保姆作证，她偶然间目睹过一个奇怪的场景：伍迪·艾伦跪在迪伦·法罗跟前，将头埋在她的膝盖中间。她认为艾伦的这个举动有点异样。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/04/27/nyregion/therapist-is-pressed-by-judge-in-allen-case.html

法官反复询问心理医生：对一个小女孩来说，如果一个女人之前是你姐姐，突然变成你爸爸的女朋友，这对她有什么影响？关于这点的考量成为判决抚养权的关键。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/04/28/nyregion/yale-study-about-allen-flawed-expert-testifies.html

一位儿童心理学家指出，耶鲁纽黑文医院之前对迪伦·法罗所做的调查是有缺陷的，他们采用的方法有错误，所以得出的「伍迪·艾伦并没有猥亵迪伦·法罗」的结论不可靠。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/05/05/nyregion/allen-farrow-trial-ends-in-new-round-of-old-charges.html

官司一轮接一轮，进展不大。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/06/08/nyregion/allen-loses-to-farrow-in-bitter-custody-battle.html

艾伦输掉抚养权官司，从此不得探视养女迪伦·法罗。但法庭同时驳回了对他猥亵迪伦的指控，法庭的结论是「evidence inconclusive」。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/06/10/nyregion/farrow-spurns-allen-s-plea-for-a-truce.html

官司结束，输掉抚养权的伍迪·艾伦请求双方「停战」，米亚·法罗表示拒绝。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/09/25/nyregion/connecticut-prosecutor-won-t-file-charges-against-woody-allen.html

康涅狄格州检察官说，他可能有理由相信伍迪·艾伦的确猥亵了养女，他也签发了逮捕令，但经过和米亚·法罗沟通，让女儿出庭对她的成长不好，也许放过伍迪·艾伦才是对孩子最好的做法，所以他决定不再追查这个案子。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/10/14/nyregion/woody-allen-asks-connecticut-to-discipline-prosecutor.html

伍迪·艾伦向有关部门提出抗议，批评康涅狄格州检察官误导公众。

http://www.aIhUaU.com1993/11/04/nyregion/woody-allen-fails-to-beat-a-prosecutor.html

康涅狄格州有关方面否决了伍迪·艾伦要求惩罚检察官的抗议。

http://www.aIhUaU.comonline/daily/2013/10/mia-farrow-children-family-scandal

2013年10月的《名利场》文章，米亚·法罗说她和伍迪·艾伦的儿子罗南·法罗可能是和弗兰克·辛纳屈所生。

http://www.aIhUaU.comhollywood/2013/11/mia-farrow-frank-sinatra-ronan-farrow

2013年11月的又一篇《名利场》文章《妈妈米亚》。

http://kristof.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/02/01/an-open-letter-from-dylan-farrow

2014年2月1日那封重新引起轩然大波的迪伦·法罗在《纽约时报》的公开信。

网友米青卫对[伍迪·艾伦]伍迪·艾伦真的有恋童癖吗？给出的答复：
An Open Letter From Dylan Farrow （伍迪·艾伦的养女写的公开信）.
对伍迪·艾伦在纽约时报所发表文章的反驳：
Dylan的反驳 -- Dylan Farrow Responds to Woody Allen: 'Distortions and Outright Lies'
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
名利场的反驳 -- 10 Undeniable Facts About the Woody Allen Sexual-Abuse Allegation
十个无可争辩的事实（译文/转述）

1.Dylan的养母Mia根本没有去警察局举报性侵。在1992年8月5日Mia的律师让她带Dylan去看儿童医生，在听到Dylan所说的事情后，医生在8月6日报警，因为法律规定医生发现这类情况后必须报警。

2.在性侵指控前，因被指有针对Dylan的不当行为，伍迪·艾伦曾去看心理医生。Mia已经叮嘱保姆们不要让伍迪·艾伦单独和Dylan呆在一起。

3.康涅狄格州警方要求给伍迪·艾伦做一次测谎，他拒绝了。伍迪·艾伦确实做了一次测谎，但是由他的法律团队雇佣的人员操作的，警方拒绝将这次测谎的结果作为证据。州检察官Frank Macon说在调查过程中，警方从未要求给Mia做测谎。

4.伍迪·艾伦在接下来输掉了4场官司 -- 一次诉讼，一次对检方违规的投诉，和两次上诉 -- 并且被要求支付给Mia超过一百万美元的诉讼费。负责抚养权一案的法官Elliott Wilk说，没有可信的证据证明Mia指使了Dylan或Mia想要报复。

5.在33页的判决书中，Elliott Wilk法官说伍迪·艾伦针对Dylan的行为“严重不恰当，且必须采取措施来保护Dylan”。

6.Dylan的指控与当天在场的3个成年人的证词相符。一位保姆的朋友宣誓作证说，当天她在房子里的时候，伍迪·艾伦和Dylan消失了15到20分钟。另一位保姆同样在法庭宣誓作证说，同一天，她看到Dylan坐在沙发上的时候，伍迪·艾伦把脸贴在Dylan的大腿上。一个法语家教作证说，在那一天，她当发现Dylan在背心裙下面没有穿内裤。第一位保姆同样作证说，在Dylan把事情说出前，她没有把两个人消失的事情告诉Mia。

7.Yale-New Haven医院儿童性侵诊所的3人组认定Dylan没有遭到猥亵，Wilk法官和最初委派他们去做鉴定的康州检方都认为这一结果不可信。3人组中只有一名儿童医生，Dr.John Leventhal。小组中没有任何一人是心理学家或心理医生。小组中另外两人是社工，且从未作证。唯一作证的Dr.John Leventhal根本没有和Dylan或Mia见面。

8.一开始伍迪·艾伦告诉警方他根本没有去那个阁楼。后来警方在阁楼的油漆中发现了他的头发，他又改嘴称他“可能”去过一两次。

9.州检察官Maco公开说，他确实找到了足够的证据来起诉伍迪·艾伦，但考察到“儿童受害者”的脆弱才没有起诉。Maco说他拒绝把Dylan放到证人席上去受折磨，而没有Dylan作证，他没办法起诉。

10.我（Maureen Orth）不是Mia Farrow的多年好友，也没有和她坐交易。我第一次见到Mia是在2003年，而我的第一篇（相关）文章的发表时间是在那之前的10多年。
================================================
伍迪·艾伦的亲儿子，15岁本科毕业、16岁就被耶鲁法学院录取的亲儿子Ronan，发Twitter支持姐姐Dylan。
Ronan Farrow Tweets Support For Dylan Farrow Following Woody Allen Sexual Abuse Allegations
MSNBC主播Mika公开在电视上表示相信Dylan，说以后不会再看伍迪·艾伦的电影。
Mika Brzezinski Backs Dylan Farrow, Condemns Woody Allen
公开支持Dylan的人中还包括HBO热播剧《Girls》的主演、编剧和导演Lena Dunham。
其他支持Dylan的人见：
Dylan Farrow's Woody Allen Letter: Lenah Dunham Calls it 'Courageous, Powerful and Generous'
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
伍迪·艾伦在42岁的时候，有一个17岁的女朋友叫Stacey Nelkin。
在自导自编自演的电影Manhattan中，伍迪·艾伦得到了当时16岁的女演员Mariel Hemingway的初吻。
注意看时间，注意看伍迪·艾伦的动作：

网友一菲对[伍迪·艾伦]伍迪·艾伦真的有恋童癖吗？给出的答复：
是否真假，涉及法律方面的判断，普通人只有opinion，很难有conclusion.

所以我的看法是：任何才华，财富，荣誉，在人的基本价值观面前，都不应该享有“特权”。

网友陈舒逸对[伍迪·艾伦]伍迪·艾伦真的有恋童癖吗？给出的答复：
我选择相信 指控伍迪·艾伦：且慢这个版本

简单地说，Mia Farrow当时确实选择了报案，并有Dylan的供词和一段“被性侵”后拍的视频说明了当时的过程。但调查小组认为证据不够确凿，Dylan很有可能是在养母的教唆下说自己被性侵然后录了视频。当时家里的保姆也认为Allen没可能犯案。
“如果米娅所述属实，那么就意味着发生过如下的事：在有关监护权和赡养费谈判的关键当口，在此期间伍迪理应规规矩矩，在一所属于他怒气冲冲的前女友的房子内，其中充满了对他忿忿不平的人们，伍迪，这个有名的幽闭恐怖症患者，觉得这是千载难逢的良机，把他的女儿领上了阁楼并侵害了她，如此之快，在一屋子的小孩和保姆发觉他们两个失踪之前做完。 ”（来自上文链接）

且从我个人角度来看，伍迪艾伦电影里确实有对传统道德的轻视，包括婚外情、忘年恋，但没有恋童的倾向。他与宋宜在交往前，除了几次探访，并无父女或养父女关系。他们结婚在我看来除了听起来有些奇怪，道德上并无不妥。跟20岁姑娘交往，与娈童还是有实质区别的。

网友沈墨对[伍迪·艾伦]伍迪·艾伦真的有恋童癖吗？给出的答复：
”没有证据证明他是清白的 “———如果每个人需要证明自己的清白，那我想每个人都有可能是罪犯了!这样的论据真的是很搞笑！我不是支持伍迪艾伦，但是我们可能都不是很清楚这整件事情，任何事情不能随自己的妄想而武断的给出结论。因此如果是我还是会好好欣赏他的电影！！

网友付恒对[伍迪·艾伦]伍迪·艾伦真的有恋童癖吗？给出的答复：
可能性很大。

1.伍迪艾伦有乱伦的倾向。他可以娶养女，那么性侵养女也是有可能的。其实只要问一个简单的问题，如果是你，你会爱上20岁的宋宜吗？反正我是不会，她的相貌可以用「丑」来形容，难道伍迪艾伦的品位还不如你我？喜欢10多岁的宋宜才比较符合一个好莱坞导演的身份。宋宜不满10岁就随米娅过到了伍迪·艾伦的身边，乱伦是有可能发生的。

2.即便夫妻存在矛盾，恐怕还不至于诬陷对方性侵自己的女儿，因为这对女儿的名誉也是一种巨大的伤害。92年那时候Dylan还很小呢。这种控告也是有一定证据的，比如保姆的证词，再比如和宋宜的关系，此外儿子Ronan女儿Dylan都站在米亚这边。

3.问题也可以这么问：伍迪艾伦性侵养女是假的吗？我找不出证据证明他做了这件事情，但是更重要的是：没有证据证明他是清白的。

--------------------------------------

还有犹太人对媒体的控制是一手遮天的，包括部分中国的媒体。犹太人非常团结，会互相帮助，为什么扎克伯格能在24岁就弄出Facebook？因为这对犹太人做生意非常有帮助，而扎克伯格就是犹太人。此外，如果像伍迪艾伦这样的犹太名人碰到什么麻烦，是会有人出来给他洗白的。不分青红皂白。

你看到的永远都是假象。没有媒体能脱离金钱，只要有钱的地方就没有真相。

网友何欢对[伍迪·艾伦]伍迪·艾伦真的有恋童癖吗？给出的答复：
伍迪艾伦的回应如下：

Woody Allen Responds: ‘I Did Not Molest Dylan’

Twenty-one years ago, when I first heard Mia Farrow had accused me of child molestation, I found the idea so ludicrous I didn’t give it a second thought. We were involved in a terribly acrimonious breakup, with great enmity between us and a custody battle slowly gathering energy. The self-serving transparency of her malevolence seemed so obvious I didn’t even hire a lawyer to defend myself. It was my show business attorney who told me she was bringing the accusation to the police and I would need a criminal lawyer.

I na?vely thought the accusation would be dismissed out of hand because of course, I hadn’t molested Dylan and any rational person would see the ploy for what it was. Common sense would prevail. After all, I was a 56-year-old man who had never before (or after) been accused of child molestation. I had been going out with Mia for 12 years and never in that time did she ever suggest to me anything resembling misconduct. Now, suddenly, when I had driven up to her house in Connecticut one afternoon to visit the kids for a few hours, when I would be on my raging adversary’s home turf, with half a dozen people present, when I was in the blissful early stages of a happy new relationship with the woman I’d go on to marry — that I would pick this moment in time to embark on a career as a child molester should seem to the most skeptical mind highly unlikely. The sheer illogic of such a crazy scenario seemed to me dispositive.

Notwithstanding, Mia insisted that I had abused Dylan and took her immediately to a doctor to be examined. Dylan told the doctor she had not been molested. Mia then took Dylan out for ice cream, and when she came back with her the child had changed her story. The police began their investigation; a possible indictment hung in the balance. I very willingly took a lie-detector test and of course passed because I had nothing to hide. I asked Mia to take one and she wouldn’t. Last week a woman named Stacey Nelkin, whom I had dated many years ago, came forward to the press to tell them that when Mia and I first had our custody battle 21 years ago, Mia had wanted her to testify that she had been underage when I was dating her, despite the fact this was untrue. Stacey refused. I include this anecdote so we all know what kind of character we are dealing with here. One can imagine in learning this why she wouldn’t take a lie-detector test.

Meanwhile the Connecticut police turned for help to a special investigative unit they relied on in such cases, the Child Sexual Abuse Clinic of the Yale-New Haven Hospital. This group of impartial, experienced men and women whom the district attorney looked to for guidance as to whether to prosecute, spent months doing a meticulous investigation, interviewing everyone concerned, and checking every piece of evidence. Finally they wrote their conclusion which I quote here: “It is our expert opinion that Dylan was not sexually abused by Mr. Allen. Further, we believe that Dylan’s statements on videotape and her statements to us during our evaluation do not refer to actual events that occurred to her on August 4th, 1992… In developing our opinion we considered three hypotheses to explain Dylan’s statements. First, that Dylan’s statements were true and that Mr. Allen had sexually abused her; second, that Dylan’s statements were not true but were made up by an emotionally vulnerable child who was caught up in a disturbed family and who was responding to the stresses in the family; and third, that Dylan was coached or influenced by her mother, Ms. Farrow. While we can conclude that Dylan was not sexually abused, we can not be definite about whether the second formulation by itself or the third formulation by itself is true. We believe that it is more likely that a combination of these two formulations best explains Dylan’s allegations of sexual abuse.”

Could it be any clearer? Mr. Allen did not abuse Dylan; most likely a vulnerable, stressed-out 7-year-old was coached by Mia Farrow. This conclusion disappointed a number of people. The district attorney was champing at the bit to prosecute a celebrity case, and Justice Elliott Wilk, the custody judge, wrote a very irresponsible opinion saying when it came to the molestation, “we will probably never know what occurred.”

But we did know because it had been determined and there was no equivocation about the fact that no abuse had taken place. Justice Wilk was quite rough on me and never approved of my relationship with Soon-Yi, Mia’s adopted daughter, who was then in her early 20s. He thought of me as an older man exploiting a much younger woman, which outraged Mia as improper despite the fact she had dated a much older Frank Sinatra when she was 19. In fairness to Justice Wilk, the public felt the same dismay over Soon-Yi and myself, but despite what it looked like our feelings were authentic and we’ve been happily married for 16 years with two great kids, both adopted. (Incidentally, coming on the heels of the media circus and false accusations, Soon-Yi and I were extra carefully scrutinized by both the adoption agency and adoption courts, and everyone blessed our adoptions.)

Mia took custody of the children and we went our separate ways.

I was heartbroken. Moses was angry with me. Ronan I didn’t know well because Mia would never let me get close to him from the moment he was born and Dylan, whom I adored and was very close to and about whom Mia called my sister in a rage and said, “He took my daughter, now I’ll take his.” I never saw her again nor was I able to speak with her no matter how hard I tried. I still loved her deeply, and felt guilty that by falling in love with Soon-Yi I had put her in the position of being used as a pawn for revenge. Soon-Yi and I made countless attempts to see Dylan but Mia blocked them all, spitefully knowing how much we both loved her but totally indifferent to the pain and damage she was causing the little girl merely to appease her own vindictiveness.

Here I quote Moses Farrow, 14 at the time: “My mother drummed it into me to hate my father for tearing apart the family and sexually molesting my sister.” Moses is now 36 years old and a family therapist by profession. “Of course Woody did not molest my sister,” he said. “She loved him and looked forward to seeing him when he would visit. She never hid from him until our mother succeeded in creating the atmosphere of fear and hate towards him.” Dylan was 7, Ronan 4, and this was, according to Moses, the steady narrative year after year.

I pause here for a quick word on the Ronan situation. Is he my son or, as Mia suggests, Frank Sinatra’s? Granted, he looks a lot like Frank with the blue eyes and facial features, but if so what does this say? That all during the custody hearing Mia lied under oath and falsely represented Ronan as our son? Even if he is not Frank’s, the possibility she raises that he could be, indicates she was secretly intimate with him during our years. Not to mention all the money I paid for child support. Was I supporting Frank’s son? Again, I want to call attention to the integrity and honesty of a person who conducts her life like that.

Now it’s 21 years later and Dylan has come forward with the accusations that the Yale experts investigated and found false. Plus a few little added creative flourishes that seem to have magically appeared during our 21-year estrangement.

Not that I doubt Dylan hasn’t come to believe she’s been molested, but if from the age of 7 a vulnerable child is taught by a strong mother to hate her father because he is a monster who abused her, is it so inconceivable that after many years of this indoctrination the image of me Mia wanted to establish had taken root? Is it any wonder the experts at Yale had picked up the maternal coaching aspect 21 years ago? Even the venue where the fabricated molestation was supposed to have taken place was poorly chosen but interesting. Mia chose the attic of her country house, a place she should have realized I’d never go to because it is a tiny, cramped, enclosed spot where one can hardly stand up and I’m a major claustrophobe. The one or two times she asked me to come in there to look at something, I did, but quickly had to run out. Undoubtedly the attic idea came to her from the Dory Previn song, “With My Daddy in the Attic.” It was on the same record as the song Dory Previn had written about Mia’s betraying their friendship by insidiously stealing her husband, André, “Beware of Young Girls.” One must ask, did Dylan even write the letter or was it at least guided by her mother? Does the letter really benefit Dylan or does it simply advance her mother’s shabby agenda? That is to hurt me with a smear. There is even a lame attempt to do professional damage by trying to involve movie stars, which smells a lot more like Mia than Dylan.

After all, if speaking out was really a necessity for Dylan, she had already spoken out months earlier in Vanity Fair. Here I quote Moses Farrow again: “Knowing that my mother often used us as pawns, I cannot trust anything that is said or written from anyone in the family.” Finally, does Mia herself really even believe I molested her daughter? Common sense must ask: Would a mother who thought her 7-year-old daughter was sexually abused by a molester (a pretty horrific crime), give consent for a film clip of her to be used to honor the molester at the Golden Globes?

Of course, I did not molest Dylan. I loved her and hope one day she will grasp how she has been cheated out of having a loving father and exploited by a mother more interested in her own festering anger than her daughter’s well-being. Being taught to hate your father and made to believe he molested you has already taken a psychological toll on this lovely young woman, and Soon-Yi and I are both hoping that one day she will understand who has really made her a victim and reconnect with us, as Moses has, in a loving, productive way. No one wants to discourage abuse victims from speaking out, but one must bear in mind that sometimes there are people who are falsely accused and that is also a terribly destructive thing. (This piece will be my final word on this entire matter and no one will be responding on my behalf to any further comments on it by any party. Enough people have been hurt.)

爱华网本文地址 » http://www.aihuau.com/a/350251/993003793751.html